A Complete Guide to Importing Solar Panels From China to Chile
The definitive sourcing reference for Chilean procurement teams and project developers
1. Why Import Solar Panels from China?
For Chilean procurement managers evaluating global suppliers, China is not simply a cost option - it is the backbone of the global photovoltaic supply chain. In 2025, Chinese manufacturers controlled over 80% of every manufacturing stage: from polysilicon and wafers to cells and finished modules. That concentration reflects industrial depth built over 15 years of continuous investment, not a temporary pricing anomaly.
Price Competitiveness: The 2025–2026 Reality
Module prices from China fell to historic lows through mid-2025, then began recovering sharply from December 2025 onward, driven by China's VAT export rebate elimination (effective April 1, 2026), rising silver costs, and polysilicon supply discipline. The table below reflects current market conditions as of Q2 2026:
|
Origin Region |
FOB Price Range (USD/W, Q2 2026) |
Typical Technology |
Lead Time |
|
China (Tier-1) |
$0.10 – $0.13 |
TOPCon (95% of shipments) |
4 – 8 weeks |
|
Europe (DDP) |
€0.115 – €0.130/W (~$0.125–$0.14) |
TOPCon / HJT |
6 – 10 weeks |
|
Southeast Asia (OEM) |
$0.13 – $0.17 |
TOPCon |
6 – 12 weeks |
|
USA (DDP) |
$0.25 – $0.30 |
PERC / TOPCon (tariff-affected) |
8 – 16 weeks |
Pricing note: OPIS assessed FOB China TOPCon forward prices for Q2–Q3 2026 at $0.120–$0.121/W - up 30%+ from the December 2025 low of ~$0.082/W. This upward trend is structurally driven and is likely to persist through 2027 as industry consolidation reduces overcapacity. Buyers securing pricing in 2026 are buying at a historically competitive window before further normalization.
Technology Leadership: TOPCon Has Displaced PERC
The transition from PERC to TOPCon is effectively complete. In 2025, TOPCon modules accounted for approximately 95% of shipments among ranked global suppliers, while PERC's share dropped to 1–2%. Chilean buyers still being offered PERC modules at 'discount' prices should treat this as a red flag about the supplier's technology roadmap and production cost competitiveness.
|
Technology |
Efficiency (Mass Prod.) |
Temp. Coeff. (Pmax) |
Year-1 Degradation |
Market Share 2025 |
Verdict for Chile |
|
PERC (p-type) |
20.5% – 21.5% |
-0.35% / °C |
~2.0% |
~1–2% |
Avoid for new projects |
|
TOPCon (n-type) |
22.5% – 23.8% |
-0.28% to -0.30% / °C |
~1.0% |
~95% |
Standard specification ✓ |
|
HJT (n-type) |
23.5% – 24.5% |
-0.24% to -0.26% / °C |
~0.5% |
<5% |
Premium projects ✓ |
|
Bifacial TOPCon |
23.0% – 24.2% (front) |
-0.28% / °C |
~1.0% |
Dominant in utility |
Best for Norte Grande ✓ |
Sources: InfoLink Consulting Q1 2026 market report; IRENA Global Solar Report 2025; REN21 GSR 2025.
Supply Chain Scale
In 2025, China's total PV module exports climbed roughly 13% year-on-year to approximately 267.6 GW, according to Chinese customs data. The top four manufacturers - JinkoSolar, LONGi, Trina Solar, JA Solar - collectively accounted for around 58% of all tracked global shipments. This scale means Chilean buyers with a 1 MW rooftop order and developers with a 200 MW utility plant can be served by the same factory infrastructure, with predictable lead times and auditable quality systems.
2. Chile's Growing Demand for Solar Energy
Chile is no longer an emerging solar market - it is a mature, rapidly scaling one. As of March 2026, operational photovoltaic capacity stood at 11,999 MW, with an additional 10,203 MW of renewable capacity under construction. Solar PV already accounts for approximately 60% of Chile's total renewable installed capacity. The question for procurement teams is not whether to buy solar, but when and from whom.
Installed Capacity: A Decade of Growth
|
Year |
Cumulative Solar PV (GW) |
Solar Share of Generation (%) |
Key Milestone |
|
2020 |
2.6 GW |
8.5% |
Net billing law expands C&I access |
|
2021 |
4.0 GW |
12.0% |
Utility-scale NCRE auctions accelerate |
|
2022 |
5.9 GW |
14.8% |
+2.14 GW added - record at the time |
|
2023 |
9.7 GW |
18.5% |
+1.65 GW; transmission bottlenecks emerge |
|
2024 |
11.1 GW |
22.3% |
+1.2 GW; tariff unfreezing drives C&I solar surge |
|
2025 |
11.6 GW |
31.1% |
Solar + wind hit 38% of total generation |
|
Mar 2026 |
12.0 GW (operational) |
28.7% (March) |
10.2 GW under construction; solar peak hit 75.1% |
|
2027 (forecast) |
~16+ GW |
~38–40% |
4,500 MW pipeline due for commissioning |
Sources: CNE Monthly Renewable Energy Report (Feb 2026); ACERA (Oct 2025); Generadoras de Chile bulletin (May 2026); CEN operational data (Jan 2026).
The Electricity Price Shock - Why C&I Solar ROI Has Improved
Between June 2024 and early 2026, Chilean retail electricity tariffs increased by an average of 60%, following the government's unwinding of a price freeze that had been in place since 2019. As of September 2025, residential tariffs reached CLP 255.75/kWh (USD $0.279/kWh) and commercial tariffs stood at CLP 183.08/kWh (USD $0.200/kWh) - among the highest in South America, at 143% of the regional average for businesses.
|
Electricity Price Benchmark |
Value (Sept 2025) |
Context |
|
Residential tariff (Chile) |
CLP 255.75/kWh (~$0.279/kWh) |
173% of world average |
|
Commercial/business tariff |
CLP 183.08/kWh (~$0.200/kWh) |
121% of world average; 143% of SA average |
|
Industrial spot (Aug 2025) |
CLP 90.4/kWh (~$0.099/kWh) |
Large industrial consumers on spot contracts |
|
LCOE for new C&I solar (2026 est.) |
~$0.03–0.05/kWh |
Simple payback 5–8 years at current tariffs |
The tariff hike will persist: consumers will continue paying off the accumulated $6 billion sector debt through elevated tariffs until approximately 2035. This creates a decade-long favorable economic environment for solar self-consumption installations across all segments.
Demand Segments: Where the Orders Are Coming From
|
Demand Segment |
Key Driver (2025–2026) |
Typical System Size |
Urgency Level |
|
Mining (Norte Grande) |
60% electricity cost increase + ESG mandates from global investors |
5 – 200 MW |
Very High |
|
C&I (Santiago, Valparaíso) |
Tariff shock; new free-market access for >300 kW consumers (Jan 2025) |
100 kW – 5 MW |
High |
|
Agricultural (Central Valley) |
Irrigation electrification; pump cost increase |
100 kW – 2 MW |
High |
|
Utilities / IPPs |
10.2 GW under construction; ongoing NCRE contract tenders |
50 – 500 MW |
Very High |
|
Distributed (PMGD) |
3,539 MW operational Dec 2025; regulatory mechanism under review |
Up to 9 MW |
Medium |
|
Residential (Net Billing) |
383 MW installed (Jul 2025); 33,247 installations nationwide |
3 – 20 kW |
Growing |

3.Which Solar Panels Are Best for Chile?
With 12 GW of installed capacity and projects operating across a 4,000 km north-south range, Chile's solar market has generated substantial field data on what performs - and what fails. Module selection should go beyond efficiency ratings on a spec sheet and reflect the real operating environment at your project site.
Chile's Three Solar Zones
|
Zone |
Regions |
GHI (kWh/m²/yr) |
Temperature Range |
Primary Stress Factor |
|
Norte Grande (Atacama) |
I, II, III |
2,200 – 2,450 |
5°C – 42°C (day) |
UV intensity, thermal cycling, dust, altitude |
|
Norte Chico |
IV, V (coastal) |
1,900 – 2,200 |
8°C – 32°C |
Salt mist, coastal humidity, moderate dust |
|
Zona Central |
V – VII |
1,600 – 1,900 |
4°C – 35°C |
Soiling, humidity variation |
|
Sur de Chile |
VIII – XIV |
1,100 – 1,500 |
0°C – 28°C |
Frost, rain, low irradiation |
Atacama context: Norte Grande receives some of the highest solar irradiation on Earth - the Atacama Desert exceeds 2,400 kWh/m²/year at altitude, compared to Spain's ~1,800 and Germany's ~1,100. This is not just a yield advantage; it also means UV-induced degradation risk is significantly higher than in typical European test conditions that many module certifications reference.
Module Recommendations by Application
|
Application / Location |
Recommended Specification |
Key Reasoning |
|
Atacama utility-scale (Norte Grande) |
Bifacial TOPCon, double-glass, 580–620W |
Bifacial gain on high-albedo desert; glass-glass eliminates backsheet UV degradation; thermal cycling resistance |
|
Mining operations (2,000–4,500m altitude) |
TOPCon N-type double-glass, 580W+, IEC 61215 tested |
Low Pmax temp. coeff. critical; double-glass withstands altitude UV; certified arc resistance for industrial use |
|
C&I rooftop (Santiago, Valparaíso) |
Monofacial TOPCon, 440–470W, 182mm cell |
Maximizes output per m² on constrained rooftops; cost-effective; lighter than double-glass (structural load consideration) |
|
Agricultural ground-mount (Central Valley) |
Bifacial TOPCon, white backsheet, 550–580W |
Balanced bifacial gain and cost; standard aluminum frame; bifacial gain on light soil increases yield 8–15% |
|
Distributed / PMGD (<9 MW) |
TOPCon 550–580W, monofacial or bifacial |
Fast installation, bankable technology for project finance, compliant with CNE interconnection technical standards |
|
Residential rooftop (Net Billing) |
Monofacial TOPCon 420–450W, or all-black aesthetic |
High efficiency per m²; compact format; all-black variants available for aesthetic-sensitive installations |
Temperature Coefficient: Why It Matters More in Chile Than Europe
Module efficiency is rated at STC (25°C cell temperature). In the Atacama, actual cell operating temperatures routinely reach 60–70°C. The energy loss due to heating is calculated as: Power loss = (Tcell - 25°C) × |Pmax temp. coefficient|. For a module operating at 65°C:
|
Technology |
Pmax Temp. Coeff. |
Power Loss at 65°C |
Effective Output (500W module at 65°C) |
|
PERC |
-0.35% / °C |
14.0% loss |
430 W |
|
TOPCon |
-0.29% / °C |
11.6% loss |
442 W |
|
HJT |
-0.25% / °C |
10.0% loss |
450 W |
Over 25 years in the Atacama, the 12W differential between PERC and TOPCon per module (at typical operating conditions) compounds into approximately 3–5% more lifetime energy output from a TOPCon system of equivalent rated capacity.
4.Certifications Required for Importing Solar Panels into Chile
Chile does not operate a standalone national certification system for photovoltaic modules. Requirements are defined by CNE grid connection standards, EPC contractor specifications, and project finance lender requirements - all of which reference international IEC standards. The following table distinguishes mandatory from strongly recommended certifications:
|
Certification |
Standard |
Status for Chile |
Certifying Body |
What It Covers |
|
IEC 61215-1:2021 |
Design qualification & type approval |
MANDATORY |
TÜV SÜD, UL, Bureau Veritas, Intertek, SGS |
Electrical and mechanical performance under environmental stress |
|
IEC 61730-1/2:2023 |
Safety qualification |
MANDATORY |
TÜV SÜD, UL, Bureau Veritas |
Electrical safety; fire resistance classification |
|
CE Marking |
European conformity declaration |
Strongly recommended |
EU Notified Bodies |
Facilitates re-export; EPC lender preference |
|
ISO 9001:2015 |
Quality management system |
Strongly recommended |
Accredited third-party auditor |
Factory QMS; required by most project finance lenders |
|
IEC 61701 (Salt Mist) |
Salt mist corrosion resistance |
Recommended (coastal / Norte Chico) |
Accredited labs |
Frame and junction box corrosion; required for coastal projects |
|
IEC 62804 (PID) |
Potential-Induced Degradation resistance |
Recommended |
Accredited labs |
High-voltage string systems; standard in utility projects |
|
IEC 63209 (Stress Test) |
Extended stress testing |
Premium specification |
TÜV, UL |
Long-term reliability beyond standard IEC 61215 cycles |
|
ISO 14001:2015 |
Environmental management system |
Commercial / ESG value |
Third-party auditor |
Mining sector and ESG-screened procurement |
Customs procedure: Chilean Servicio Nacional de Aduanas (SNA) requires Certificate of Origin, commercial invoice, packing list, and Bill of Lading for clearance. IEC 61215 and 61730 test reports are required for CNE grid connection applications. Always verify certificate expiry dates - IEC 61215-1:2021 replaced the 2016 version, and some suppliers present outdated certificates from superseded standards.

5.Solar Panel Shipping Process from China to Chile
Getting modules from a Chinese factory to a Chilean project site involves four distinct legs: factory-to-port trucking, ocean freight, customs clearance, and in-country delivery. Each leg has its own cost structure, lead time, and risk profile that procurement teams need to manage proactively.
Container Loading Capacities
|
Container Type |
Module Count (approx.) |
Total Power (430–470W modules) |
Best Use Case |
|
20' FCL |
580 – 650 pcs |
~250 – 305 kW |
C&I orders; first-time trial shipments |
|
40' FCL (standard) |
1,250 – 1,450 pcs |
~540 – 680 kW |
Mid-size projects; mixed cargo |
|
40' HC (High Cube) |
1,450 – 1,750 pcs |
~625 – 820 kW |
Standard for utility-scale; best $/W freight |
|
Flat rack / OOG |
As required |
Variable |
Oversized trackers, steel structures, inverter skids |
Weight vs. volume: Modern bifacial double-glass modules (580W+) weigh approximately 32–36 kg each vs. ~22–25 kg for standard monofacial modules. A 40' HC loaded with double-glass modules can hit the shipping weight limit before the volume limit is reached. Always confirm with your freight forwarder whether your specific module is weight-constrained or volume-constrained before finalizing container count.
Main Shipping Routes: China → Chile (2026)
|
Origin Port |
Destination Port |
Transit Time |
Route |
Notes |
|
Shanghai (CNSHA) |
San Antonio (CLSAI) |
28 – 35 days |
Via Panama Canal |
Primary route; largest Chilean container terminal by throughput |
|
Shanghai (CNSHA) |
Valparaíso (CLVAP) |
30 – 37 days |
Via Panama Canal |
Alternative; close proximity to Santiago and Región Metropolitana projects |
|
Ningbo (CNNGB) |
San Antonio (CLSAI) |
28 – 34 days |
Via Panama Canal |
Efficient for factories in Zhejiang province |
|
Shenzhen (CNSZX) |
Iquique (CLIQQ) |
32 – 40 days |
Via Panama Canal |
Used for Norte Grande / Atacama project deliveries |
|
Guangzhou (CNGZH) |
Arica (CLARC) |
33 – 42 days |
Via Panama Canal |
Northernmost Chilean port; used for cross-border Bolivia logistics |
Note: Panama Canal drought restrictions resurfaced in 2023–2024, causing some carriers to reroute via the Cape of Good Hope, adding 7–14 days to transit. As of Q2 2026, Panama Canal operations have normalized, but buyers should confirm routing with their forwarder and purchase marine insurance that covers extended transit deviations.
Typical Order Timeline: Factory to Site
|
Milestone |
Timeframe from PO |
Notes |
|
Purchase order + 30% deposit |
Day 0 |
TT advance or LC at sight |
|
Production slot confirmed |
Day 1 – 3 |
Factory confirms production schedule |
|
Production completion |
Day 14 – 35 |
Varies with factory load; busy Q3–Q4 may add 1–2 weeks |
|
Pre-shipment inspection (PSI) |
Day 28 – 40 |
Third-party: SGS, Bureau Veritas, Intertek - allow 3–5 days |
|
Balance payment (70%) |
Before B/L release |
Against shipping documents or inspection pass |
|
Vessel departure (Shanghai/Ningbo) |
Day 35 – 48 |
Weekly sailings on main China–Chile services |
|
Arrival San Antonio / Valparaíso |
Day 63 – 85 |
28–37 day ocean transit via Panama |
|
Chilean customs clearance |
Day 66 – 90 |
Typically 3–7 business days; expedited with experienced agent |
|
Delivery to project site |
Day 70 – 100 |
Dependent on inland distance and road access |
6.Import Costs and Hidden Expenses
The FOB price in a quotation is rarely what you pay delivered to site. Based on current (Q2 2026) freight and cost conditions, Chilean buyers should budget for a landed cost that is approximately 25–35% above the FOB module price. The breakdown below uses a 1 MW order as a reference case (approximately two 40' HC containers of 580W TOPCon modules).
Full Landed Cost Breakdown: 1 MW, Q2 2026
|
Cost Item |
Estimated Amount (USD) |
% of Total Landed |
Notes |
|
Modules FOB (1 MW @ $0.11/W) |
$110,000 |
~71% |
Mid-range Q2 2026 pricing; volume-dependent |
|
Ocean freight (2x 40' HC) |
$5,000 – $10,000 |
4–6% |
Current transpacific rates; lower than 2022–2023 peaks |
|
Marine insurance (0.3–0.5% of CIF) |
$350 – $620 |
~0.3% |
Non-negotiable; always insure |
|
Chilean import duty (6% CIF) |
$6,900 – $7,200 |
~4.5% |
MFN rate; check FTA status at time of import |
|
IVA - Chilean VAT (19% on CIF+duty) |
$22,000 – $23,500 |
~14% |
Recoverable for registered businesses (Formulario 29) |
|
Customs agency fee (Aduana) |
$400 – $900 |
<1% |
Fixed professional fee; use specialist in PV imports |
|
Port handling, storage, terminal fees |
$600 – $1,500 |
<1% |
Minimize with timely clearance; demurrage adds fast |
|
Pre-shipment inspection (PSI) |
$900 – $1,600 |
<1% |
Strongly recommended; cost is minor vs. risk exposure |
|
Inland trucking to site (variable) |
$1,500 – $12,000 |
1–7% |
Santiago: low end; Atacama/Norte Grande: high end |
|
TOTAL LANDED (est.) |
~$148,000 – $167,000 |
100% |
Excluding IVA recovery; recoverable IVA reduces net cost |
The April 2026 VAT Policy Change: Why Prices Are Rising
On April 1, 2026, China eliminated its 9% VAT export rebate on solar modules. This policy effectively raised the production cost basis for all Chinese manufacturers exporting modules. Combined with silver price increases (approximately +200% year-on-year in 2025) and polysilicon supply discipline, this structural shift means FOB prices are unlikely to return to the December 2025 lows of ~$0.08/W. Buyers evaluating 2026–2027 projects should model $0.10–$0.13/W as the realistic FOB range and plan procurement timing accordingly.
IVA Recovery: Critical for Project Economics
Chile's 19% IVA applies at customs and is paid upfront. For a 1 MW order, this represents $22,000–$24,000 in cash tied up until recovery. Key points:
Registered Chilean businesses (RUT con IVA) can recover IVA as a tax credit via monthly Formulario 29 filing - typically within 1–3 months
Community projects, municipalities, and individuals without full IVA registration cannot recover - this must be factored into project budgets
For large projects (5 MW+), the IVA float can represent $100,000+ - plan the cash flow accordingly
Common Hidden Costs
|
Hidden Cost |
Trigger |
Typical Impact |
|
Demurrage |
Customs clearance >5–7 free days at port |
$150 – $350/container/day |
|
Container detention |
Slow unloading or storage at site |
$80 – $220/container/day |
|
HS code reclassification |
Customs challenges 8541.40 classification |
$500 – $3,000 per event + delay |
|
Currency volatility (USD/CLP) |
CLP has moved ±15% in 12-month windows |
2–5% on balance payment if unhedged |
|
Repackaging at port |
Damaged packaging flagged by customs inspector |
$500 – $2,500 + 2–5 day delay |
|
PSI failure rework |
Quality issues found pre-shipment; supplier must re-sort or replace |
$500 – $8,000 + 5–15 day delay |

7.How to Choose a Reliable Chinese Solar Panel Supplier
With TOPCon now the industry standard and module prices rising, the risk calculus for supplier selection has shifted. The cheapest quote is increasingly coming from financially stressed manufacturers - InfoLink warned in early 2026 that a third consecutive year of losses would trigger 'special treatment' designations under Chinese stock market rules for several listed makers. Choosing a supplier based primarily on price today may mean your warranty counterparty no longer exists in five years.
Supplier Evaluation Framework
|
Evaluation Criterion |
What Tier-1 Looks Like |
Warning Signs |
|
Factory ownership |
Owned manufacturing; vertically integrated cells + modules preferred |
Trading company presenting as manufacturer; OEM-only operation |
|
Annual production capacity |
≥1 GW; own cell line preferred; capacity independently verifiable |
Unauditable capacity claims; suspiciously low prices suggest Tier-3 OEM |
|
Automation level (2026 standard) |
Automated stringing, soldering, EL testing on 100% of outgoing modules |
Manual assembly lines; no in-line EL inspection |
|
Certification currency |
Current IEC 61215-1:2021 + IEC 61730-1/2:2023 from TÜV/UL/BV; not expired |
Certificates from 2020 or earlier; issued by obscure labs; mismatched product codes |
|
International project track record |
Verifiable delivered projects in similar climates (desert, altitude, mining) |
Only domestic China references; no third-party project verification |
|
Warranty structure |
25-year linear power guarantee backed by third-party insurance; 12-year product warranty |
Warranty issued solely by manufacturer with no insurance backing; no linear degradation guarantee |
|
Financial health |
Listed company or audited financials; operational since >2010 |
No audit trail; registered <3 years; prices consistently 25%+ below market |
|
Quality monitoring |
Third-party statistical EL sampling per shipment; IQC data available |
Relies solely on own internal QC; no third-party inspection option |
Why Jingsun Solar for Chile
Jingsun Solar is a vertically integrated TOPCon manufacturer with dedicated international project support for the Latin American market. Key differentiators for Chilean procurement teams:
Spanish-language technical and commercial support team for Chilean clients
Delivered and verified projects in high-altitude, high-UV desert environments comparable to Atacama operating conditions
Current TÜV-certified IEC 61215-1:2021 and IEC 61730-1/2:2023 compliance across all TOPCon product lines
Insurance-backed 25-year linear power warranty (up to 87.4% end-of-life retention)
100% automated EL inspection on all outgoing modules - not statistical sampling
Free pre-shipment inspection coordination with SGS, Bureau Veritas, or Intertek at buyer's choice
Flexible payment: TT 30/70, LC at sight, or TT against BL for established clients
Free logistics plan including container count, port selection, and CIF estimate within 24 hours
8. Common Mistakes Chilean Buyers Make
These are the most consequential procurement errors observed across Chilean solar projects - from C&I rooftops in the Región Metropolitana to utility-scale plants in Antofagasta. Each one is avoidable with the right process.
|
Mistake |
Why It Happens |
Real Consequence |
How to Avoid It |
|
Choosing on FOB price alone |
FOB quotes are easy to compare; total landed cost requires more analysis |
Hidden costs (IVA float, freight, customs, inland delivery) erode apparent savings; inferior LCoE over project life |
Always model total landed cost + 25-year LCoE; the cheapest FOB is rarely the cheapest delivered |
|
Accepting outdated certifications |
Certificates look similar; buyers don't verify issue date, lab accreditation, or product code match |
CNE grid connection rejected; project finance lender refuses to accept modules; insurance voided |
Request original certificates; verify on TÜV/UL/BV issuer portals; confirm product code matches what you're buying |
|
Assuming all '25-year warranties' are equal |
All manufacturers claim 25-year warranty; terms vary enormously |
Warranty exists only on paper; financially stressed supplier cannot honor claims; no recourse after project finance closes |
Request warranty insurance certificate; confirm insurance carrier; check manufacturer's financial standing |
|
Ignoring temperature coefficient for hot climates |
Spec sheets show nominal efficiency at STC (25°C); real field conditions are much hotter |
3–5% annual energy shortfall vs. design in Atacama; affects revenue in PPA-contracted projects |
Model actual annual output using site temperature data and measured Pmax Tc; specify minimum Tc in procurement terms |
|
Still specifying PERC for new projects |
Familiarity from past projects; assumption that PERC offers cost savings |
Lower efficiency, 1–2% faster annual degradation, 3–5% lower lifetime output - PERC's market share is now 1–2% globally |
Default to TOPCon N-type for all new 2026+ project specifications; PERC price advantage has effectively disappeared |
|
Skipping pre-shipment inspection |
PSI cost ($900–$1,600) feels disproportionate to order value |
Off-spec, mislabeled, or damaged product discovered at site; no recourse after B/L released; project delays |
PSI by accredited third party is non-negotiable; the cost is 0.8–1.4% of order value; the risk it mitigates is 100% |
|
Underestimating customs complexity |
First-time China import; relying on supplier's recommended freight agent |
Demurrage, HS reclassification disputes, IVA recovery errors, delays - all avoidable |
Engage a Chilean customs agent with documented PV import experience before issuing the PO, not after arrival |
9. Request a Quote from Jingsun Solar
Whether you are procuring modules for a 50 kW commercial rooftop in Santiago or a 100 MW ground-mount in Antofagasta, Jingsun's Chile team provides complimentary pre-sales services designed to take the guesswork out of Chinese procurement:
|
Free Service |
What You Receive |
Turnaround |
|
Product Selection Consultation |
Module type, wattage, and technology recommendation based on your site zone, altitude, and application - not a generic catalog |
24 hours |
|
Logistics & Shipping Plan |
Container count, optimal port (San Antonio vs. Valparaíso vs. Iquique), estimated transit time, and current freight cost for your volume and destination |
24–48 hours |
|
Project Technical Review |
Estimated annual energy output with temperature de-rating and bifacial gain (where applicable) for your specific location - using real CNE irradiation data |
48–72 hours |
|
Current TOPCon Pricing (June 2026) |
Latest FOB and CIF pricing for your required volume, delivery window, and module specification - reflecting current post-VAT-rebate market conditions |
Same day |

Get Your Free Chile Procurement Package
✔ Module selection matched to your project zone and application
✔ Shipping plan with cost estimate to your preferred Chilean port
✔ 2026 TOPCon pricing (post-VAT-rebate) within 24 hours
✔ No obligation - technical advice, not a sales pitch


